Cases 1 - 10 of 14
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 0:2022cv62364
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446 Notice of Removal
Orso v. Witt
as 8:2021mc00033
Defendant:
Todd Disner and Carol Witt
Plaintiff:
Matthew E. Orso as successor trustee to Kenneth D. Bell in his capacity as court appointed receiver for Rex Venture group, LLC doing business as Zeekrewards.com
Interested Party:
Nationwide Judgment Recovery, Inc.
USA v. Danyel Witt
as 21-10557
Defendant / Appellant:
DANYEL MICHELLE WITT
Plaintiff / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Savage v. J and J Transports of Alabama, Inc. et al
as 6:2020cv00893
Plaintiff:
Clyde Savage
Defendant:
J and J Transports of Alabama, Inc., Ricky Witt and Dustin Witt
Donjon-Smit, LLC v. Schultz et al
as 2:2020cv00011
Plaintiff:
Donjon-Smit, LLC
Defendant:
Admiral Karl L. Schultz, Commander Norm C. Witt, Commander Matthew J. Baer and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Witt v. Palmer
as 1:2019cv00077
Plaintiff:
Louis Witt
Defendant:
Tracy S. Palmer
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442
Witt v. The Law Offices of Mitchell D. Bluhm & Associates, LLC
as 0:2019cv60199
Defendant:
The Law Offices of Mitchell D. Bluhm & Associates, LLC
Plaintiff:
Noah Witt
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Witt v. The Law Offices of Mitchell D. Bluhm & Associates, LLC
as 0:2019cv60190
Defendant:
The Law Offices of Mitchell D. Bluhm & Associates, LLC
Plaintiff:
Noah Witt
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Alexis De Witt v. U.S. Attorney General
as 13-14804
Petitioner:
ALEXIS DE WITT
Respondent:
U.S. ATTORNEY GENERAL
Betts v. SGE Energy Management, Ltd. et al
as 4:2009cv00174
Defendant:
SGE Management, LLC, SGE Management, LLC, SGE Management, LLC and others
Plaintiff:
Perry Betts, Perry Betts, Perry Betts and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1962 Racketeering (RICO) Act
Type:
Other Statutes
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
