Cases 1 - 10 of 193
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2024cv00359
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Ketchen, III v. DRJ Gainesville K, LLC et al
as 3:2023cv01504
Plaintiff:
Sandy Lomax Ketchen, III and Sandy L. Ketchen, III
Defendant:
DRJ Gainesville K, LLC a Florida limited liability company doing business as Jenkins Kia of Gainesville and Ally Financial, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 49 U.S.C. § 32701 Findings and Purposes
KETCHEN v.DRJ GAINESVILLE K LLC et al
as 1:2024cv00037
Plaintiff:
SANDY L KETCHEN, III
Defendant:
DRJ GAINESVILLE K LLC A FLORIDA LIMITED LIABILITY COMPANY doing business as JENKINS KIA OF GAINESVILLE and ALLY FINANCIAL INC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
GUNN et al v. META PLATFORMS INC et al
as 3:2022cv00072
Plaintiff:
JULIE G JENKINS and JAMES P GUNN
Defendant:
META PLATFORMS, INC, HOLDER CONSTRUCTION COMPANY, PLATEAU EXCAVATION, INC. and others
Cause Of Action: 33 U.S.C. § 1365 Environmental Matters
MRB Law LLC v. Drake et al
as 1:2023cv01434
Plaintiff:
MRB Law LLC
Defendant:
Quanisha Drake and Sherman T Jenkins
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1335 Interpleader Action
Hind et al v. FxWinning Limited et al
as 1:2023cv23139
Plaintiff:
Kristoffer Jon Hind, Jason Thomas Waiton, Christopher Campbell and others
Defendant:
FxWinning Limited, CFT Solutions, LLC, Renan de Rocha Gomes Bastos and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 0078 Securities Exchange Act
Park Plus, Inc. v. The Automated Parking Company, LLC et al
as 0:2023cv60587
Plaintiff:
Park Plus, Inc.
Defendant:
The Automated Parking Company, LLC and Ash Jenkins
JENKINS v. RIVIAN AUTOMOTIVE LLC et al
as 3:2023cv00047
Plaintiff:
JULIE G JENKINS
Defendant:
RIVIAN AUTOMOTIVE, LLC, RIVIAN HORIZON, LLC, THOMAS & HUTTON ENGINEERING, INC. and others
Cause Of Action: 33 U.S.C. § 1365 Environmental Matters
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
