Cases 1 - 10 of 18
Otto Candies, LLC, et al v. Citigroup Inc.
as 23-13152
Plaintiff / Appellant:
OTTO CANDIES, LLC, CANDIES MEXICAN INVESTMENTS S. DE R.L. DE C.V., ASHMORE EMERGING MARKETS CORPORATE HIGH YIELD FUND LIMITED and others
Defendant / Appellee:
CITIGROUP INC.
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2021cv00073
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681
Ashmore et al v. Kohn et al
as 2:2019mc03866
Defendant:
Future Income Payments, LLC and Scott A. Kohn
Receiver:
Beattie B. Ashmore
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 754
United States of America et al v. Kohn et al
as 6:2019mc00027
Not Yet Classified:
Beattie B. Ashmore
Defendant:
Future Income Payments LLC and Scott A. Kohn
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 754
Otto Candies, LLC, et al v. Citigroup, Inc., et al
as 18-12663
Plaintiff - Appellant:
OTTO CANDIES, LLC, CANDIES MEXICAN INVESTMENTS S. DE R.L. DE C.V., ASHMORE EMERGING MARKETS CORPORATE HIGH YIELD FUND LIMITED and others
Defendant - Appellee:
CITIGROUP, INC.
Otto Candies, LLC et al v. Citigroup Inc.
as 1:2016cv20725
Plaintiff:
Otto Candies, LLC , Candies Mexican Investments S. de R.L. de C.V. , Ashmore Emerging Markets Corporate High Yield Fund Limited and others
Defendant:
Citigroup Inc.
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1962
Ashmore v. McRay
as 1:2013mc21493
Plaintiff:
Beattie B. Ashmore
Defendant:
Florence McRay
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question
United States Of America v. Wilson et al
as 4:2012mc00020
Plaintiff:
United States Of America
Defendant:
Ronnie Gene Wilson and Atlantic Bullion & Coin, Inc.
Receiver:
Beattie B. Ashmore
USA v. Wilson et al
as 1:2012mc22894
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Defendant:
Ronnie Gene Wilson and Atlantic Bullion & Coin, Inc.
Receiver:
Beattie B. Ashmore
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 0754
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
