Cases 1 - 10 of 17
Combs et al v. Staggs et al
as 3:2024cv00224
Plaintiff:
Bradley Combs
Defendant:
Timothy Staggs, Timothy Weakley, Hannah Weakley Carroll and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv01357
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 8:2022cv00647
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
William Lucy v. Gus Thames, Jr., et al
as 21-14243
Plaintiff / Appellant:
WILLIAM N. LUCY, Personal Representative of Annie D. Fox (Deceased)
Defendant / Appellee:
GUS B. THAMES, JR., in his Personal and Official Capacity d.b.a. Sixety One St. Francis Street Inc. d.b.a. Thames Jackson Harris Co. Realty, MARK ERWIN, Mobile Co. Probate Court Chief Clerk, in his Personal and Official Capacity, FRANK KRUSE, Esq., Mobile County Gen. Administrator,in his Personal and Official Capacity and others
Bert Combs, et al v. American Strategic Insurance
as 20-14685
Defendant / Appellant:
AMERICAN STRATEGIC INSURANCE CORP.
Plaintiff / Appellee:
APRIL COMBS, JUNIOUS BROWN, BERT COMBS and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 8:2020cv01725
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Mitchell v. NurseCon at Sea, LLC et al
as 1:2020cv21503
Defendant:
Royal Caribbean International and NurseCon at Sea, LLC
Plaintiff:
Jessica Mitchell and Kenneth Combs, Jr.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
In re: Glennis Combs
as 16-16840
Petitioner:
In re: GLENNIS DEWAIN COMBS
Successive Habeas Respondent:
ATTORNEY GENERAL, STATE OF FLORIDA
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2016cv20524
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
