Cases 1 - 10 of 13
Zhang v. FXTrade ZH, LP et al
as 2:2022mc00014
Plaintiff:
Xuejun Zhang
Defendant:
FXTrade ZH, LP, Dragon Capital Group, LLC, Stephen L. Kirkland and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1963 Registration of judgment from another district
Lin et al v. Mayorkas et al (MAG+)
as 2:2022cv00162
Plaintiff:
Mei Yan Lin, Cheng Kai Wu and Cheng Wei Wu
Defendant:
Alejandro Mayorkas, Merrick Garland and Kirt Thompson
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 551 Administrative Procedure Act
Cheng et al v. Ally Financial Inc. et al
as 1:2021cv21318
Defendant:
Square Inc., The Charles Schwab Corporation, Freetrade, Ltd. and others
Plaintiff:
Shane Cheng and Terell Sterling
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 0001 Antitrust Litigation
Bell v. Disner et al
as 1:2020mi00081
Defendant:
Trudy Gilmond, David Kettner, David Sorrells and others
Plaintiff:
Kenneth D. Bell in his capacity as court-appointed Receiver for Rex Venture Group, LLC d/b/a ZeekRewards.com
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1963
USA v. Fabio Rodriguez
as 20-10411
Defendant / Appellant:
FABIO ACHONG CHENG RODRIGUEZ
Plaintiff / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
United States of America v. Chou
as 5:2019cv00384
Defendant:
Chuen Cheng Chou
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1345 Injunctions Against Fraud
Li et al v. Walsh, et al
as 9:2016cv81871
Plaintiff:
LAN LI , YING TAN , TAO XIONG and others
Defendant:
JOSEPH WALSH, JOSEPH WALSH, JR., J. MARCUS PAYNE and others
Cause Of Action: 12 U.S.C. § 0022
Mu Wu v. US Attorney General
as 12-16150
Petitioner:
MU YING WU and RU CHENG ZHANG
Respondent:
U.S. ATTORNEY GENERAL
Cheng et al v. Aim Sports, Inc. et al
as 4:2011mi00003
Plaintiff:
Carson Cheng and New Century Sci & Tech, Inc.
Defendant:
Aim Sports, Inc., Guoping Cui, Ying Cui and others
Yang Wei v. U.S. Attorney General
as 11-11925
Petitioner:
YANG CHENG WEI
Respondent:
U.S. ATTORNEY GENERAL
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
