Cases 1 - 7 of 7
Jan Aitken, et al v. US Stem Cell Clinic, LLC, et al
as 19-13409
Defendant / Appellee:
US STEM CELL, INC. and US STEM CELL CLINIC, LLC, a Florida limited liability company
Not Yet Classified:
LYDIA CRONIN, BARBARA BURNS, ELAINE MURIN and others
Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation v. Copenhaver et al
as 8:2013cv02037
Plaintiff:
Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation
Defendant:
Ronald H. Copenhaver, Corey J. Coughlin, Camden Ted French and others
Cause Of Action: 12 U.S.C. § 1819 Default of Promissory Note
Brestle v. Federal Bureau of Prisons et al
as 2:2011mc00002
Petitioner:
Gary Charles Brestle
Respondent:
Federal Bureau of Prisons, Anthony Haynes, Jeff Coughlin and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2009cv02837
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 Job Discrimination (Sex)
Type:
Other Statutes
Securities and Exchange Commission v. Provident Royalties, LLC et al
as 1:2009mc00029
Plaintiff:
Securities and Exchange Commission, Securities and Exchange Commission, Securities and Exchange Commission and others
Defendant:
Provident Royalties, LLC, Provident Asset Management, LLC, Provident Energy 1, LP and others
Cause Of Action: Registration of Foreign Judgment
Type:
Other Statutes
Securities and Exchange Commission et al v. Provident Royalties, LLC. et al
as 2:2009mc03459
Plaintiff:
Securities and Exchange Commission, Securities and Exchange Commission, Securities and Exchange Commission and others
Defendant:
Provident Royalties, LLC., Provident Asset Management, LLC., Provident Energy 1, LP. and others
Receiver:
Dennis L. Roossien, Jr.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 754 Receiver of Property in Different Districts
Fenster v. Casey William Coughlin, P.A.
as 0:2008cv60776
Plaintiff:
Elliot Fenster
Defendant:
Casey William Coughlin, P.A.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
