Cases 1 - 6 of 6
State of Georgia, et al v. President of the United States, et al
as 21-14269
Plaintiff / Appellee:
STATE OF GEORGIA, STATE OF ALABAMA, STATE OF IDAHO and others
Defendant / Appellant:
PRESIDENT OF THE UNITED STATES, SAFER FEDERAL WORKFORCE TASK FORCE, UNITED STATES OFFICE OF PERSONNEL MANAGEMENT and others
Amicus Curiae:
AMERICAN ACADEMY OF ALLERGY, ASTHMA & IMMUNOLOGY, AMERICAN ACADEMY OF FAMILY PHYSICIANS, AMERICAN ACADEMY OF PEDIATRICS and others
Not Classified By Court:
SERVICE and AMERICAN PSYCHIATRICS INSTITUTE
The State of Georgia et al v. Biden et al
as 1:2021cv00163
Plaintiff:
The State of Georgia, The State of Alabama, The State of Idaho and others
Defendant:
Joseph R. Biden, Safer Federal Workforce Task Force, United States Office of Personnel Management and others
Not Yet Classified:
Associated Builders and Contractors of Georgia, Inc.
Amicus Curiae:
American Medical Association
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702
Llamas et al v. U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement et al
as 6:2020cv02264
Defendant:
Cybersecurity and Infrastructure Security Agency, U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement, U.S. Department of Energy and others
Plaintiff:
Noelle Llamas and Ken Klippenstein
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 0552
Ned Rosenbloom v. Atomic Energy Commission, et al
as 15-11934
Plaintiff - Appellant:
NED L. ROSENBLOOM
Defendant - Appellee:
ATOMIC ENERGY COMMISSION and U.S. DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT
Rosenbloom v. Atomic Energy Commission et al
as 1:2014cv21601
Plaintiff:
Ned L. Rosenbloom
Defendant:
Atomic Energy Commission and US Department of Energy Environmental Management
Cause Of Action: 33 U.S.C. § 1365
Marvis Ivey v. Secretary, Department of Energ, et al
as 13-15014
Petitioner:
MARVIS MCDANIEL IVEY
Respondent:
SECRETARY, DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY and US DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
