Cases 1 - 10 of 14
State of West Virginia, et al v. U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, et al
as 24-11702
Petitioner:
STATE OF WEST VIRGINIA, STATE OF GEORGIA, STATE OF ARKANSAS and others
Respondent:
U.S. ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY and ADMINISTRATOR OF THE ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY
State of Florida v. Secretary, U.S. Department of Homeland Security, et al
as 23-11644
Plaintiff / Appellee:
STATE OF FLORIDA
Defendant / Appellant:
SECRETARY, U.S. DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY, CHIEF OF THE UNITED STATES BORDER PATROL and UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Not Classified By Court:
THE STATE OF VIRGINIA, THE STATE OF ALABAMA, STATE OF ALASKA and others
Amicus Curiae:
AMERICANS FOR IMMIGRANT JUSTICE, CANIZARES LAW GROUP LLC, CATHOLIC CHARITIES LEGAL SERVICES and others
State of Florida v. USA, et al
as 23-11528
Plaintiff / Appellee:
STATE OF FLORIDA
Defendant / Appellant:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, ACTING COMMISSIONER OF U.S. CUSTOMS AND BORDER PROTECTION, UNITED STATES CUSTOMS AND BORDER PROTECTION and others
Amicus Curiae:
IMMIGRATION REFORM LAW INSTITUTE, THE STATE OF VIRGINIA, AMERICANS FOR IMMIGRANT JUSTICE and others
Not Classified By Court:
THE STATE OF ALABAMA, STATE OF ALASKA, THE STATE OF ARKANSAS and others
The State of Arizona et al v. Garland et al
as 1:2023cv01324
Plaintiff:
The State of Arizona, The State of Louisiana, The State of Missouri and others
Defendant:
Merrick Garland, The United States Department of Justice, David Neal and others
Petitioner:
Innovation Law Lab
The State of Arizona et al v. Garland et al
as 1:2023mi00015
Plaintiff:
The State of Arizona, The State of Louisiana, The State of Missouri and others
Defendant:
Merrick Garland, The United States Department of Justice, David Neal and others
Petitioner:
Innovation Law Lab
State of Florida et al v. Walensky et al
as 8:2022cv00718
Plaintiff:
STATE OF FLORIDA, STATE OF ALABAMA, STATE OF ALASKA and others
Defendant:
ROCHELLE P WALENSKY, CENTERS FOR DISEASE CONTROL AND PREVENTION, SHERRI A BERGER and others
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 0702 Administrative Procedure Act
State of Georgia, et al v. President of the United States, et al
as 21-14269
Plaintiff / Appellee:
STATE OF GEORGIA, STATE OF ALABAMA, STATE OF IDAHO and others
Defendant / Appellant:
PRESIDENT OF THE UNITED STATES, SAFER FEDERAL WORKFORCE TASK FORCE, UNITED STATES OFFICE OF PERSONNEL MANAGEMENT and others
Amicus Curiae:
AMERICAN ACADEMY OF ALLERGY, ASTHMA & IMMUNOLOGY, AMERICAN ACADEMY OF FAMILY PHYSICIANS, AMERICAN ACADEMY OF PEDIATRICS and others
Not Classified By Court:
SERVICE and AMERICAN PSYCHIATRICS INSTITUTE
The State of Georgia et al v. Biden et al
as 1:2021cv00163
Plaintiff:
The State of Georgia, The State of Alabama, The State of Idaho and others
Defendant:
Joseph R. Biden, Safer Federal Workforce Task Force, United States Office of Personnel Management and others
Not Yet Classified:
Associated Builders and Contractors of Georgia, Inc.
Amicus Curiae:
American Medical Association
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702
People First of Alabama, et al v. Secretary of State, et al
as 20-13695
Plaintiff / Appellant:
BLACK VOTERS MATTER CAPACITY BUILDING INSTITUTE, GREATER BIRMINGHAM MINISTRIES, HOWARD PORTER, JR. and others
Not Classified By Court:
SERVICE
Defendant / Appellant:
DON DAVIS, SECRETARY OF STATE FOR THE STATE OF ALABAMA, STATE OF ALABAMA and others
Amicus Curiae:
STATE OF KENTUCKY, STATE OF KANSAS, STATE OF TEXAS and others
The New Georgia Project, et al v. Brad Raffensperger, et al
as 20-13360
Defendant / Appellant:
AHN LE, in their official capacities as Members of the Georgia State Election Board, DAVID J. WORLEY, BRAD RAFFENSPERGER, in his official capacity as the Georgia Secretary of State and the Chair of the Georgia State Election Board and others
Plaintiff / Appellee:
BEVERLY PYNE, CANDACE WOODALL, REAGAN JENNINGS and others
Not Classified By Court:
SERVICE
Amicus Curiae:
STATE OF KENTUCKY, STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA, STATE OF FLORIDA and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
