Cases 31 - 36 of 36
Heron v. Rodriguez et al
as 3:2011cv00422
Plaintiff:
Herbert Hugh Heron
Defendant:
Edwin Rodriguez, Albert J. Hadeed, Milissa Holland and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981
Linder v. Mac et al
as 3:2011cv00033
Plaintiff:
Chris H. Linder
Defendant:
Freddie Mac , Wells Fargo Home Mortgage, Inc. , McCalla Raymer, LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal
FDIC v. Arboretum Development, LLC et al
as 2:2010cv00313
Plaintiff:
FDIC
Defendant:
Arboretum Development, LLC , Bayshore Club, L.P., Peter T. Dvorak and others
Cross_claimant:
Board of County Commissioners, Collier County, FL
Cross_defendant:
Peter T. Dvorak, Bayshore Club, L.P., FDIC and others
Counter_claimant:
Board of County Commissioners, Collier County, FL
Counter_defendant:
Peter T. Dvorak, Bayshore Club, L.P., FDIC and others
Movant:
Robert Brian Crim
Cause Of Action: 12 U.S.C. § 1819
BURGESS et al v. HOLMES COUNTY BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS et al
as 5:2010cv00081
Plaintiff:
WANDA LOU BURGESS and DANNY BURGESS
Defendant:
HOLMES COUNTY BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS, HOLMES COUNTY ROAD DEPARTMENT and DON BENTON
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
United States of America v. 22.58 Acres of Land, More or Less, Situated in Montgomery County, State of Alabama et al
as 2:2008cv00180
Defendant:
OSI, Inc., 22.58 Acres of Land, More or Less, Situated in Montgomery County, State of Alabama, Revenue Commissioner and others
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 40 U.S.C. § 258 (a) Public Buildings & Property: Land Condem
Concerned Citizens for African American Historic Preservation v. Glynn County Board of Commissioners et al
as 2:2007cv00052
Plaintiff:
Concerned Citizens for African American Historic Preservation
Defendant:
Glynn County Board of Commissioners, Charlie Stewart, Paul Christian and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 (a) Fed. Question: Real Property
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
