Cases 11 - 20 of 3,722
Jones v. Starbucks Corporation
as 2:2024cv00372
Defendant:
Starbucks Corporation
Plaintiff:
Acacia T. Jones
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Wright v. Jones
as 1:2024cv02793
Defendant:
Bob Jones
Plaintiff:
Gregory Wright
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Personal Injury
Jones et al v. McCoy et al
as 3:2024cv00369
Defendant:
R.M. Greene, Inc. a domestic corporation doing business as CTV Beam, Dijoin M. McCoy and State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company
Plaintiff:
Emily D. Henry and Gregory D. Jones, Jr.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Auto Negligence
Jones v. Dillard's Inc. et al
as 1:2024cv02626
Plaintiff:
Demetria Jones
Defendant:
John Doe 1-3 and Dillard's Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446 Petition for Removal- Personal Injury
SCOLARO JONES v. NCL (Bahamas) Ltd.
as 1:2024cv22189
Plaintiff:
LYNNE MARIE SCOLARO JONES
Defendant:
NCL (Bahamas) Ltd.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity
LYNNE MARIE SCOLARO JONES v. NCL (BAHAMAS) LTD.
as 1:2024cv22190
Defendant:
NCL (BAHAMAS) LTD.
Plaintiff:
LYNNE MARIE SCOLARO JONES
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity
Jones v. AAM Equipment LLC
as 1:2024cv00171
Plaintiff:
James T. Jones
Defendant:
AAM Equipment LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1333 in Personal Injury
Jones v. Reedy
as 3:2024cv00470
Plaintiff:
Marquita Jones
Defendant:
James Reedy
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Notice of Removal
Suazo et al v. Dubois Chemical Inc. et al
as 1:2024cv02073
Plaintiff:
Scott Suazo and Ashley Fuentes
Defendant:
Dubois Chemical Inc. and Richard Jones
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446 Notice of Removal - Motor Vehicle
Harding-Jones v. City of Atlanta, Georgia et al
as 1:2024cv01796
Plaintiff:
Heather Harding-Jones
Defendant:
City of Atlanta, Georgia and Kone, Inc,
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446 Petition for Removal- Personal Injury
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
