Cases 41 - 50 of 99
MARTIN v. Sanofi USA Inc.
as 9:2020cv81889
Defendant:
Sanofi USA Inc., Amazon.com, Inc., Walgreens Boot Alliance, Inc. and others
Plaintiff:
NATHANIEL MARTIN
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Thomas v. Wal-Mart, Inc. et al
as 2:2020cv00232
Defendant:
Wal-Mart, Inc. and John and Jane Does #1-10
Plaintiff:
Gregory Thomas
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Estelle, et al v. Wal-Mart, Inc. et al
as 5:2020cv00472
Plaintiff:
JAN VAN JOOLEN and DORAN ESTELLE
Defendant:
Wal-Mart, Inc. and SHAW EDWARD
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Smith et al v. Wal-Mart,Inc. et al
as 1:2020cv03670
Defendant:
Sam's Club, John Doe, Sam's East, Inc. and others
Plaintiff:
Bertha Smith and Dennis Smith
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
MONTGOMERY v. SANOFI-AVENTIS U.S. LLC et al
as 9:2020cv81239
Defendant:
DOES 1-100, DR. REDDYS LABORATORIES, LTD, SANOFI US SERVICES INC and others
Plaintiff:
JAMES MONTGOMERY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Rison v. Sanofi SA et al
as 9:2020cv81622
Defendant:
Chattem Inc., Boehringer Ingelheim Pharmaceuticals Inc., DR. REDDY'S LABORATORIES, LTD. and others
Plaintiff:
Sudie Rison
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
v. Johnstone et al
as 9:2020cv81626
Defendant:
Wal-Mart, Inc., Chattem Inc., Boehringer Ingelheim Pharmaceuticals Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Johnstone v. Sanofi SA et al
as 9:2020cv81628
Defendant:
Chattem Inc., Boehringer Ingelheim Pharmaceuticals Inc., DR. REDDY'S LABORATORIES, LTD. and others
Plaintiff:
Ronne Kay Johnstone
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Grizzard et al v. Wal-Mart East, LP et al
as 3:2020cv00106
Plaintiff:
Larry Grizzard and Phyllis Grizzard
Defendant:
Wal-Mart, Inc., John Doe A-C and Wal-Mart Stores East, LP
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Kindell v. Wal-Mart Stores East, LP
as 2:2020cv00071
Plaintiff:
Kristi Kindell
Defendant:
Wal-Mart, Inc. and Wal-Mart Stores East, LP
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
