Torts - Injury Cases filed in the Eleventh Circuit Courts
Cases 1 - 10 of 2,222
IN RE: ARC Airbag Inflators Products Liability Litigation
as 1:2022md03051
Plaintiff: Lisa Mann, Jimmy Mann, Richard Topa and others
Defendant: Arc Automotive, Inc., General Motors LLC, Kia Corporation and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Motor Vehicle Product Liability
Dunn et al v. Takata Corporation et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2014cv24009
Plaintiff: Craig Dunn, Pam Koehler, Zulemarie Rivera and others
Consolidated Plaintiff: Dorry Taylor
Defendant: Takata Corporation, TK Holdings, Inc., Highland Industries, Inc. and others
Consolidated Defendant: Nissan North America, Inc., The Hertz Corporation and Chrysler Group LLC
Claimant: John Randall Futch
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Marles et al v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
as 9:2023cv80911
Plaintiff: Plaintiff Brenda Leigh Marles, Estate of Rico Marles and Brenda Leigh Marles
Defendant: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2674 Federal Tort Claims Act
Britton et al v. ARC Automotive, Inc. et al
as 1:2023cv00090
Plaintiff: John Britton, Eva Jacinto, Celeste Felice and others
Defendant: Arc Automotive, Inc., Audi Aktiengesellschaft, Audi of America, LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Motor Vehicle Product Liability
IN RE: Takata Airbag Products Liability Litigation
as 1:2015md02599
Defendant: Takata Airbag Products Liability Litigation, General Motors LLC, Esq. Sekou Gary and others
Plaintiff: Loren Petersen, Plaintiffs Lead Counsel, Bernadette Heard and others
Consolidated Plaintiff: Ann Xiaoyan Chen, Kathryn Commiciotto, Lynndon Bais and others
Consolidated Defendant: Honda Engineering Co Ltd, American Honda Motor Co., Inc.,, Mazda Motor Corporation and others
Cross Claimant: Honda R & D Co., Ltd., Mitsubishi Motors North America, Inc., Toyota Motor Corporation and others
Special Master: John Delionado and Ryan K Stumphauzer
Consolidated 3Rd Party Defendant: TK Holdings Inc. and DWWIII Company, Inc.
Claimant: John Randall Futch
Consolidated 3Rd Party Plaintiff: Toyota Motor Sales U.S.A., Inc.
Cross Defendant: Roes 1-20 and Roes
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1407 Multidistrict Litigation
Good et al v. Boehringer Ingelheim Pharmaceuticals Inc et al
as 9:2020cv81839
Plaintiff: Lawrence Fontenot, Gayla Griffith, Robert Bezet and others
Defendant: Patheon Manufacturing Services L L C, Boehringer Ingelheim Promeco S A de C V, GlaxoSmithKline (America) Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Belo Plaintiffs v. BP Exploration & Production Inc, et al
as 22-10099
Plaintiff / Appellant: BELO PLAINTIFFS
Defendant / Appellee: BP EXPLORATION & PRODUCTION INC and BP AMERICA PRODUCTION COMPANY
IN RE: 3M COMBAT ARMS EARPLUG PRODUCTS LIABILITY LITIGATION
as 3:2019md02885
In Re: 3M COMBAT ARMS EARPLUG PRODUCTS LIABILITY LITIGATION and 3M COMPANY
Plaintiff: LIAISON COUNSEL FOR PLAINTIFFS, CO-LEAD COUNSEL FOR PLAINTIFFS, CO-LIAISON COUNSEL FOR PLAINTIFFS and others
Defendant: AEARO HOLDING LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
In Re: Engle Cases We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 3:2009cv10000
In Re: Engle Cases
Special Master: Michael J. Dewberry, U.S. Attorney A. Lee Bentley, III and Acting U.S. Attorney W. Stephen Muldrow
Plaintiff: 4432 Individual Tobacco Plaintiffs
Defendant: Various Tobacco Companies, Liggett Group LLC, Vector Group Ltd. and others
Interested Party: Lieff Cabraser Heimann & Bernstein, LLP, Farah & Farah, P.A. and Motley Rice LLC
Not Classified By Court: Stephen C. Sawicki, Mediator Michael G. Tanner, John S. Freud and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Gonzalez v. Wal-Mart Stores East, L.P.
as 1:2020cv24200
Plaintiff: Plaintiff Gail Gonzalez
Defendant: Wal-Mart Stores East, L.P.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?