Cases 131 - 140 of 732
Vinodh Raghubir v. USA, et al
as 22-12723
Plaintiff / Appellant:
VINODH RAGHUBIR
Defendant / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, STATE OF FLORIDA, U.S. ATTORNEY GENERAL and others
Vinodh Raghubir v. USA, et al
as 22-12709
Plaintiff / Appellant:
VINODH RAGHUBIR
Defendant / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, STATE OF FLORIDA, U.S. ATTORNEY GENERAL and others
Tamara Tinsley et al v. United States of America
as 0:2022cv61506
Plaintiff:
Tamara Tinsley and Patricia Lenever Long
Defendant:
United States Of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Civil Rights Violation
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2022cv00963
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2022cv00964
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights (Employment Discrimination)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2022cv00960
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Long et al v. United States Of America
as 0:2022cv61442
Plaintiff:
Patricia Lenever Long and Damien Andre Smith
Defendant:
United States Of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Civil Rights Violation
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 8:2022cv01696
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Caudle v. Lockheed Martin et al
as 5:2022cv00908
Plaintiff:
Allen Okechukwu Caudle
Defendant:
Lockheed Martin, Central Intelligence Agency, Department of Defense and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Stephens v. United States of America
as 8:2022cv01639
Plaintiff:
Elbert Stephens, Jr.
Defendant:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
