Cases 11 - 20 of 131
Clervrain et al v. Fite et al
as 3:2022cv00030
Plaintiff:
Manetirony Clervrain, Emmaunel Benjoassaint, Wislene Casir and others
Defendant:
Elizabeth L. Fite, Sarah B. Akins, Hon. J. Antonio DelCampo and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Licari v. Hughes et al
as 1:2021cv04034
Plaintiff:
Lindsey Licari
Defendant:
Rena Hughes, Mary Kay Holthus, Elizabeth Gonzalez and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
PATTERSON v. SPROUL et al
as 1:2021cv00154
Plaintiff:
ROLONDA PATTERSON
Defendant:
KEVIN SPROUL, DOUGHERTY COUNTY, PHOEBE PHYSICIANS GROUP, INC. and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2021cv00050
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Bell v. United States Department of Veterans Affairs et al
as 1:2021cv00110
Plaintiff:
William E. Bell
Defendant:
United States Department of Veterans Affairs and State Farm Bank doing business as State Farm Mutual "Good Neighbor" Automobile Insurance Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2021cv00219
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e
RODEMAKER v. CITY OF VALDOSTA BOARD OF EDUCATION et al
as 7:2021cv00076
Defendant:
KELISA BROWN, TYRA HOWARD, LIZ SHUMPHARD and others
Plaintiff:
ALAN RODEMAKER
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e
Bell v. Raffensperger et al
as 1:2021cv02486
Plaintiff:
Andrew W. Bell
Defendant:
Chris Harvey and Brad Raffensperger
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361
RODEMAKER v. CITY OF VALDOSTA BOARD OF EDUCATION et al
as 7:2021cv00020
Defendant:
KELISA BROWN, TYRA HOWARD, LIZ SHUMPHARD and others
Plaintiff:
LEAH RODEMAKER
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2020cv05281
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
