Cases 11 - 20 of 23
Larry Klayman v. President of the USA, et al
as 16-14963
Plaintiff - Appellant:
LARRY E. KLAYMAN
Defendant - Appellee:
PRESIDENT USA, in his official capacity as President of the United States of America, THOMAS E. BRANDON, Deputy Director of the U.S. Department of Justice, Head of the Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco and Firearms, U.S. ATTORNEY GENERAL, in her official capacity as U.S. Attorney General and others
Latonya Moore v. United States of America Armed, et al
as 16-12205
Plaintiff - Appellant:
LATONYA CHIREE MOORE
Defendant - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA ARMED SERVICES, STATE OF GEORGIA, STATE OF MARYLAND and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2016cv00116
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 621
Nasir v. City of Atlanta et al
as 1:2015cv03138
Plaintiff:
Faheem S. Nasir, DC
Defendant:
City of Atlanta and J. C. Grimsley
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1443
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2015cv00050
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: Americans with Disabilities Act
MOORE v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA ARMED SERVICES et al
as 1:2014cv00156
Plaintiff:
LATONYA CHIREE MOORE
Defendant:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA ARMED SERVICES, STATE OF GEORGIA, STATE OF MARYLAND and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Burk v. Ewing et al
as 1:2013cv00561
Plaintiff:
Dennis Burk
Defendant:
Mark Ewing, National Intelligence Office, Barack Obama and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 0:2008cv61677
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 8:2008cv01499
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
McLeod v. International Union of Painters & Allied Trades, DC
as 1:2008cv20470
Plaintiff:
Keith A McLeod
Defendant:
International Union of Painters & Allied Trades, DC
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
