Cases 11 - 20 of 257
Murphy v. Chauncey et al
as 6:2023cv01393
Plaintiff:
Bennie Lee Murphy
Defendant:
Keathel W. Chauncey and Natalia Qeulleett-Grice
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Kaul, MD v. Christie et al
as 1:2023cv22582
Plaintiff:
Richard Arjun Kaul, MD
Defendant:
Christopher J. Christie, Kevin Murphy and Kenneth Murphy
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question
Goodman et al v. Allen et al
as 1:2023cv03057
Plaintiff:
Valancia Goodman and Gregory Maloy
Defendant:
Sheriff/Chief Deputy Levon Allen, Chief Deputy / Sheri Roland Boehrer, Jail Adminisrator Terrance Gibson and others
4Th Party Defendant:
Jail Officer F. Radford
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2023cv00384
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 451 Employment Discrimination
Rodney Murphy v. State of Alabama, et al
as 22-14201
Plaintiff / Appellant:
RODNEY J. MURPHY
Defendant / Appellee:
STATE OF ALABAMA, VINCENT DEAS, MARENGO COUNTY DHR and others
PEREZ v. BRYANT et al
as 1:2022cv00211
Plaintiff:
Delfidio Perez
Defendant:
Freddie L Bryant, III, Tony B Herring, Jr., Kenneth L Weston, Jr. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 22-13308
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant / Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
C.J. et al v. Proctor et al
as 2:2022cv00078
Plaintiff:
C.J. and Betty Jean Murphy James
Defendant:
Jim Proctor, Michael Blaquiere, Downy Casey and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 6:2022cv01263
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 Job Discrimination (Race)
MURPHY v. DAVIS
as 5:2022cv00261
Plaintiff:
DARRELL LEON MURPHY, SR
Defendant:
SHERIFF DAVID J DAVIS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
