Civil Rights Cases filed in the Eleventh Circuit Courts
Cases 21 - 30 of 107,130
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 9:2024cv80667
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12182 Americans with Disabilities Act
Odonoghue v. Fuller
as 2:2024cv00480
Plaintiff: Wycliffe H. Odonoghue
Defendant: Judge Joseph C Fuller
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights (DO NOT USE)
Caplan v. C-Tech Auto Repairs, Inc. et al
as 0:2024cv60893
Plaintiff: Howard Michael Caplan
Defendant: C-Tech Auto Repairs, Inc., Troy Iuen and Monique Iuen
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12182 Americans with Disabilities Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv00116
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 et seq. Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 9:2024cv80663
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12182 Americans with Disabilities Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 9:2024cv80665
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12182 Americans with Disabilities Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 9:2024cv80662
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12182 Americans with Disabilities Act
Odonoghue v. Gufford
as 2:2024cv00479
Plaintiff: Wycliffe H. Odonoghue
Defendant: Charles P. Gufford
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights (DO NOT USE)
RICHARDSON v. MUSSELWHITE
as 3:2024cv00232
Plaintiff: EDWIN RICHARDSON
Defendant: TONY MUSSELWHITE
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Green v. Pierce County et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 5:2024cv00037
Plaintiff: Davey Green
Defendant: Pierce County, Charlie Wichman, Gregory Nettles and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?