Cases 21 - 30 of 987
Robert Ardis v. Darlene Dickey, et al
as 24-10470
Plaintiff:
ROBERT MICHAEL ARDIS
Defendant:
DARLENE DICKEY, WILLIAM EDDINS, SARAH HARPER CRUTCHFIELD and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv20448
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12182 Americans with Disabilities Act
Arnold v. Chronister et al
as 8:2024cv00235
Plaintiff:
Deandre Arnold
Defendant:
Sheriff Chad Chronister, Deputy Adriel Gonzales, Deputy Baez and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv00005
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Emma Prospero v. Ryan Sullivan, et al
as 24-10086
Plaintiff:
EMMA JANE PROSPERO
Defendant:
RYAN SULLIVAN, RUSSELL PRESCOTT and JAMES PROCTOR
Garimella v. Board of Regents of the University System of Georgia et al
as 1:2023cv05979
Plaintiff:
Dr. Srinivas Garimella
Defendant:
Board of Regents of the University System of Georgia, State of Georgia, Georgia Institute of Technology and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv05856
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 Job Discrimination (Sex)
Hagans et al v. Ward et al
as 4:2023cv00352
Plaintiff:
Julia Hagans, Solomon Lee, Sr. and Julia Hagins
Defendant:
Timothy Ward, Brooks Benton, Michael Anderson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv05760
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 Job Discrimination (Race)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2023cv00526
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 Job Discrimination (Sex)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
