Cases 21 - 30 of 63
Wilson v. City of Atlanta et al
as 1:2020cv02998
Defendant:
John/Jane Does, City of Atlanta and Officer Ian Mayfield
Plaintiff:
Saleem Wilson
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 9:2020cv80967
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Ramsier v. Simeon et al
as 1:2020cv01569
Defendant:
Georgy Simeon, Fulton County, Georgia, The City of Atlanta and others
Plaintiff:
Emilee Ramsier
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Trimble et al v. Emory Healthcare, Inc. et al
as 1:2020cv01469
Defendant:
Emory Healthcare, Inc., John/Jane Doe(s) 1-3 and Prachi Modi
Plaintiff:
Gabriel Hall and Quannesha Trimble
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
MINTON v. BRADLEY et al
as 5:2020cv00102
Defendant:
JARVIS CULVER, KATHERINE ELIZABETH EUBANKS, WILLIAM BRADLEY and others
Plaintiff:
BRIDGETTE IRENE MINTON
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Wallis et al v. Gierlak et al
as 5:2020cv00087
Defendant:
16th Circuit Court of Kane County, IL, Seyfarth Shaw, LLP, Jeff Bell and others
Plaintiff:
Cecilia Wallis and Scott Wallis
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Notz v. Trump et al
as 5:2019cv00651
Defendant:
Donald Trump, John/Jane Does and The State of Florida
Plaintiff:
Arthur M. Notz, III
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Geary et al v. Gwinnett County School District et al
as 1:2019cv03773
Defendant:
Gwinnett County School District, Gwinnett County Public Schools, John/Jane Does Nos. 1-5 and others
Plaintiff:
Robin Geary and Don Geary
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Schatzel et al v. Duval County School Board/District et al
as 3:2019cv00888
Defendant:
D.B.A./Durham School Bus Services, John Zeigler and successor(s), Doreen Sams and successor and others
Plaintiff:
Jane Does, Richard E. Schatzel and John Does
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Hill v. Whidden et al
as 2:2019cv00299
Plaintiff:
Jackie Hill and Jackie Simpson
Defendant:
Ricky Garcia, John/Jane Doe and Stephen H. Whidden
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
