Cases 21 - 30 of 162
GHEE v. FLIX NORTH AMERICA INC et al
as 4:2023cv00070
Plaintiff:
SAMUEL GHEE and SAMUEL GHEE, IV
Defendant:
FLIX NORTH AMERICA INC, GREYHOUND LINES INC, GORGE MORE and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Lena Lindberg v. George Maxwell, III, et al
as 23-11255
Plaintiff / Appellant:
LENA MARIE LINDBERG
Defendant / Appellee:
GEORGE W. MAXWELL, III, CHRISTINA MARIE SANCHEZ SERRANO, GEORGE C. TURNER, JR. and others
VOTE.ORG et al v. BYRD et al
as 4:2023cv00111
Plaintiff:
VOTE.ORG, FLORIDA ALLIANCE FOR RETIRED AMERICANS and FLORIDA STATE CONFERENCE OF THE NAACP
Defendant:
CORD BYRD, KIM BARTON, CHRISTOPHER MILTON and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 6:2023cv00388
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2023cv00072
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Beggs v. Quinn et al
as 5:2023cv00106
Plaintiff:
Ian E Beggs
Defendant:
Stephen Quinn, Ramon Rivera, Michael Sanchez and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Civil Rights Violation
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv00156
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 et seq. Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 8:2022cv02210
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2022cv22396
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2022cv21976
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
