Cases 31 - 40 of 1,144
Deandre Arnold v. Hillsborough County Sheriff, et al
as 24-10634
Plaintiff:
DEANDRE ARNOLD
Defendant:
CHAD CHRONISTER, HILLSBOROUGH COUNTY SHERIFF, ADRIEL GONZALES and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 8:2024cv00339
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
BUSBY v. JOHNSON
as 3:2024cv00069
Plaintiff:
JEREMY BUSBY
Defendant:
BOB JOHNSON, JOHN DOE 1 and JOHN DOE 2
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv00695
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 et seq. Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990
Taylor v. Child Support Division 1 et al
as 8:2024cv00411
Plaintiff:
Brandon Taylor
Defendant:
Child Support Division 1, Superior Court and Clerk of the Court
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2024cv00070
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446 Notice of Removal
Arnold v. Chronister et al
as 8:2024cv00235
Plaintiff:
Deandre Arnold
Defendant:
Sheriff Chad Chronister, Deputy Adriel Gonzales, Deputy Baez and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv20250
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Employment Discrimination
Harris v. Rentz et al
as 2:2024cv00009
Plaintiff:
Tremar Harris
Defendant:
Officer William Rentz and John Doe 1-3
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Razvan Rusovici v. Marcy Verduin, et al
as 24-10074
Plaintiff:
RAZVAN RUSOVICI
Defendant:
MARCY VERDUIN, in her official and individual capacity, DOE, DEFENDANTS 1-20 in their official and individual capacity and THE UNIVERSITY OF CENTRAL FLORIDA BOARD OF TRUSTEES
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
