Cases 31 - 40 of 40
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2010cv00589
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2010cv00015
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 0:2009cv61997
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 0621 Job Discrimination (Age)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 8:2009cv01202
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Peterson et al v. Hamby et al
as 1:2008cv03618
Plaintiff:
Elton Peterson and Dorothy Arlene Peterson
Defendant:
Bobby D. Hamby, Wayne Digby and Gary D. Ingram, Jr.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1443 (1)Removal from State Court - Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 6:2008cv01936
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Parkes v. Harrison, et al
as 1:2005cv22301
Plaintiff:
Stephen James Parkes
Defendant:
Harold Harrison and Arlene McDuffy
Cause Of Action: Bivens - Federal Prisoner Civil Rights
Harrell et al v. The Florida Bar et al
as 3:2008cv00015
Plaintiff:
William H. Harrell, Jr., William H. Harrell, Jr., Harrell & Harrell, P.A. and others
Defendant:
The Florida Bar, John F. Harkness, Jr., Kenneth L. Marvin and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 6:2007cv01211
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal- Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 6:2005cv00200
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 2601 Family Medical Leave Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
