Cases 31 - 40 of 95
Young Jo v. Six Unknown Named Agents, et al
as 16-16956
Plaintiff - Appellant:
YOUNG YIL JO
Defendant - Appellee:
SIX UNKNOWN NAMED AGENTS and BARACK OBAMA, Mr. President of the United States
Bush v. United States Government et al
as 1:2016cv04067
Plaintiff:
Thomas K. Bush
Defendant:
United States Government, President Barack Obama, Loretta Lynch and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1345
Bryant v. Puhl et al
as 1:2016cv03712
Plaintiff:
Hattie Mae Bryant
Defendant:
Todd Puhl, Pamela Monroe, Mark Richts and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Young Jo v. Six Unknown Names Agents or Mr
as 16-15645
Plaintiff - Appellant:
YOUNG YIL JO
Defendant - Appellee:
SIX UNKNOWN NAMES AGENTS OR MR. PRESIDENT OF THE UNITED STATES, BARACK OBAMA
Lawrence et al v. Deal et al
as 1:2016cv02406
Plaintiff:
Christopher Lawrence, Olivia M. Pontoo and Steven W. Pite
Defendant:
Nathan Deal, Attorney General of State of Georgia, Barack Obama and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 241
Tiapani v. Six Unknown Names Agents, et al
as 16-13877
Plaintiff - Appellant:
TIAPANI
Defendant - Appellee:
SIX UNKNOWN NAMES AGENTS and BARACK OBAMA, President of the United States
Santos v. Six Unknown Names Agents, et al
as 16-13878
Plaintiff - Appellant:
SANTOS
Defendant - Appellee:
SIX UNKNOWN NAMES AGENTS and BARACK OBAMA, President of the United States
Osman v. Six Unknown Names Agents, et al
as 16-13880
Plaintiff - Appellant:
OSMAN
Defendant - Appellee:
SIX UNKNOWN NAMES AGENTS and BARACK OBAMA, President of the United States
Rodriguez v. Six Unknown Names Agents, et al
as 16-13881
Plaintiff - Appellant:
RODRIGUEZ
Defendant - Appellee:
SIX UNKNOWN NAMES AGENTS and BARACK OBAMA, President of the United States
Guerrero v. Six Unknown Names Agents, et al
as 16-13879
Plaintiff - Appellant:
GUERRERO
Defendant - Appellee:
SIX UNKNOWN NAMES AGENTS and BARACK OBAMA, President of the United States
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
