Civil Rights Cases filed in the Eleventh Circuit Courts
Cases 31 - 39 of 39
Plaintiff v. Defendant We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 14-12894
Plaintiff - Appellant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant - Appellee: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Type: Civil Rights Jobs
Hooker v. Moody
as 8:2014cv01090
Plaintiff: Carlton Hooker
Defendant: James S. Moody, Jr. and Jeffrey S. Downing
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Carlton Hooker, Jr. v. Secretary, U.S. Department of We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 14-11741
Plaintiff - Appellant: CARLTON EUGENE HOOKER, JR.
Defendant - Appellee: SECRETARY, U.S. DEPARTMENT OF VETERANS AFFAIRS
Plaintiff v. Defendant We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 8:2014cv00333
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Hooker v. Shinseki We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 8:2014cv00344
Plaintiff: Carlton Eugene Hooker, Jr.
Defendant: Eric K. Shinseki
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 8:2012cv02759
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Chapman v. United States [central] government
as 0:2011cv61969
Plaintiff: Christopher Chapman and Roanne Eye
Defendant: United States [central] government, Federico A. Moreno, Rick Scott and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 8:2011cv01230
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2007mi00413
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 Job Discrimination (Sex)

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?