Cases 31 - 40 of 646
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 23-13103
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant / Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Ishanna Ible v. Wells Fargo Bank National Association, et al
as 23-13083
Plaintiff / Appellant:
ISHANNA IBLE
Defendant / Appellee:
WELLS FARGO BANK NATIONAL ASSOCIATION, AS TRUSTEE FOR CITIGROUP MORTGAGE LOAN TRUST, SERIES 2004-OPT1, ASSET BACKED PASS-THROUGH CERTIFICATES, SERIES 2004-OPT1, WAKULLA COUNTY CIRCUIT COURT, STATE OF FLORIDA and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 23-13063
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant / Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
KHALIL v. BOARD OF TRUSTEES FOR FLORIDA A&M UNIVERSITY
as 4:2023cv00408
Plaintiff:
RAFAAT KHALIL
Defendant:
BOARD OF TRUSTEES FOR FLORIDA A&M UNIVERSITY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 Job Discrimination (Age)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 9:2023cv81251
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Civil Rights Violation
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 8:2023cv02059
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 621 Job Discrimination (Age)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv23432
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12182 Americans with Disabilities Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv00336
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal - Employment Discrim
Lawton v. Camillus House Inc. et al
as 1:2023cv23142
Plaintiff:
Nishon Latia Lawton
Defendant:
Camillus House Inc. and Board of Trustees of the Internal Improvement TR Fund State of FL
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 7:2023cv01055
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 Job Discrimination (Sex)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
