Cases 41 - 50 of 143
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2019cv00063
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
JERMC LTD. et al v. Town of Redington Shores et al
as 8:2019cv00688
Defendant:
Town of Redington Shores, Joseph Walker, Tom Kapper and others
Plaintiff:
Nashaat Antonious, JERMC LTD., Soheir Antonious and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981
Wolf v. Deputy Sergeant Sims et al
as 2:2018cv00108
Defendant:
City of Cleveland, GA, Sheriff Neal Walden, White County, GA and others
Plaintiff:
Jay Wolf
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Neal v. Regions Bank et al
as 4:2018cv00156
Defendant:
Susan Wright, Kim Maples, Regions Financial Corporation and others
Plaintiff:
Tyree M. Neal, Sr.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981
Mock et al v. Glynn County, Georgia et al
as 2:2018cv00025
Plaintiff:
Margery Freida Mock and Eric Scott Ogden, Jr.
Defendant:
Glynn County, Georgia , E. Neal Jump , Alex Atwood and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Gilbert v. Thurmond et al
as 1:2018cv00683
Plaintiff:
Elisha Gilbert, Jr.
Defendant:
Michael L. Thurmond, Burrell Ellis, Lee May and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Britt v. Lee et al
as 4:2017cv00214
Plaintiff:
Shirley Britt
Defendant:
Vincent Stephen Lee and Barbara O'Neal
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Cowe v. Emory University Hospital et al
as 1:2017cv04228
Plaintiff:
Neal A. Cowe
Defendant:
Emory University Hospital and Emory University Hospital Police
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2017cv03649
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 626
Morant v. State of Alabama et al
as 1:2017cv03191
Plaintiff:
Paul Lawrence Morant, Jr.
Defendant:
State of Alabama, Henry County Sheriff's Department, City of Abbeville Police Department and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
