Cases 41 - 50 of 298
DUE v. HOFFMAN et al
as 1:2022cv00159
Plaintiff:
RANDALL DAVID DUE
Defendant:
MATTHEW R HOFFMAN and ROBERT T DAWSON
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights
DUE v. DAWSON et al
as 1:2022cv00160
Plaintiff:
RANDALL DAVID DUE
Defendant:
ROBERT T DAWSON, MATTHEW R HOFFMAN and ATTORNEY BRIAN D BAILEY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2022cv04110
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 et seq. Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 8:2022cv01785
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Job Discrimination (Race)
DUE v. DAWSON et al
as 1:2022cv00103
Plaintiff:
RANDALL DAVID DUE
Defendant:
ROBERT T DAWSON, MATTHEW R HOFFMAN and BRIAN D BAILEY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
DUE v. HOFFMAN et al
as 1:2022cv00102
Plaintiff:
RANDALL DAVID DUE
Defendant:
MATTHEW R HOFFMAN and ROBERT T DAWSON
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
MAJORS ET AL v. RETTIG ET AL
as 3:2022cv06534
Plaintiff:
ERIC MAJORS and LISA MAJORS
Defendant:
CHARLES PAUL RETTIG, SUSAN SHAW, RANDALL B CHILDS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 8:2022cv01092
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 621 Job Discrimination (Age)
Johnson v. Publix Super Markets, Inc. et al
as 0:2022cv60884
Plaintiff:
Boyd Johnson
Defendant:
Publix Super Markets, Inc., Mark R. Irby, David P. Phillips and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Civil Rights Act
Johnson v. Publix Super Markets, Inc. et al
as 0:2022cv60883
Plaintiff:
Boyd Johnson
Defendant:
Publix Super Markets, Inc., Mark R Irby, David P Phillips and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 Job Discrimination (Public Accommodations)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
