Cases 61 - 70 of 107
Hunt v. Ross Dress For Less et all Corporation's Headquarters
as 1:2014cv24912
Plaintiff:
Patricia Hunt
Defendant:
Ross Dress For Less et all Corporation's Headquarters
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981
MAY v. STATE OF FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION et al
as 4:2014cv00678
Plaintiff:
GEORGE MAY
Defendant:
STATE OF FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION and STATE OF FLORIDA SOUTH FLORIDA WATER MANAGEMENT DISTRICT ET AL
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Sciortino v. Nash, et al
as 1:2014cv03137
Plaintiff:
Ronald Edward Sciortino
Defendant:
Charlotte Nash, Gwinnett County, Georgia, Department of Water Resources and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 3601
Arthur Williams, et al v. City of Stone Mountain, GA, et al
as 14-14292
Plaintiff - Appellant:
ARTHUR WILLIAMS, DIONNE DAVIS and VINCENT CROSSBY, et al.
Defendant - Appellee:
CITY OF STONE MOUNTAIN, GEORGIA, BARRY AMOS, PATRICIA WHEELER and others
Shillingford, II v. Rolly Marine Service, Inc. et al
as 0:2014cv61936
Plaintiff:
Clinton K. Shillingford, II
Defendant:
Rolly Marine Service, Inc., Sheryl A. Lopez, Sue E. Rocks and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Griffin v. City and State Kansas Missouri, et al
as 1:2014cv22246
Plaintiff:
Willie R. Griffin
Defendant:
City and State Kansas Missouri, et al
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 14-11354
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant - Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 13-15482
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant - Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Jack Linge v. State of Georgia Inc.
as 13-15306
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JACK LINGE
Defendant - Appellee:
STATE OF GEORGIA INC., et al.
Edwards Knecht v. Daversa et al
as 9:2013cv81139
Plaintiff:
Janice Edwards Knecht
Defendant:
Jeff Daversa, Daversa & Martyn, P.A., & Attorneys Title, Southeast Guarantee & Title and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
