Cases 81 - 90 of 1,050
Thomas v. Saunders et al
as 1:2022cv04264
Plaintiff:
Matthew Thomas doing business as Buckhead Black Business Alliance
Defendant:
Ms. Candace L. Saunders and Wellstar Health Systems
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2022cv00237
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Brown v. Ruppert et al
as 1:2022cv04068
Plaintiff:
Haneif Emmanuel Brown
Defendant:
Officer Michael Ruppert, Lieutenant E. Littles, Detective D. Wysinger and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Sapp v. Brundridge et al
as 1:2022cv00126
Plaintiff:
Nicole Sapp
Defendant:
Dexter L. Brundridge, Superior Court of Richmond County, Dominion Management Services and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Stepherson v. Blinken et al
as 1:2022cv03547
Plaintiff:
Mark Anthony Stepherson
Defendant:
Antony Blinken, Debra Anne Haaland, Merrick Garland and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1333 Admiralty
Glass v. Decatur Gardens
as 1:2022cv03480
Plaintiff:
Kardarius Glass
Defendant:
Decatur Gardens
Petitioner:
Davyd L. Mincey
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2022cv00202
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 Job Discrimination (Race)
Clement v. Mitsubishi Financial Group
as 1:2022cv03387
Plaintiff:
Barton L. Clement
Defendant:
Mitsubishi Financial Group
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Abdur-Rahman v. Arrington, Jr. et al
as 1:2022cv03335
Plaintiff:
Khadijah Abdur-Rahman
Defendant:
Marvin Arrington, Jr., Natalie Hall, Elizabeth Liz Hausman and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2022cv03248
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 Job Discrimination (Race)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
