Cases 1 - 10 of 13
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 0:2021cv60512
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Guardino v. Coffey
as 3:2018cv01392
Defendant:
Mr. Craig Coffey
Plaintiff:
Stephen Leonard Guardino, Jr.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Herrera Bernal v. Canty et al
as 0:2017cv62286
Plaintiff:
Jorge Mauricio Herrera Bernal
Defendant:
Jamila Z. Canty, Eduardo Baldisieso Bascope, Andrew Matthew Coffey and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2017cv03697
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101
Olivette Coffey, Jr., et al v. Dwight Braddy, et al
as 15-11112
Plaintiff - Appellant:
OLIVETTE COFFEY, JR., HARRY J. JOHNSON, NANCY J. BRACKETT and others
Defendant - Appellee:
DWIGHT BRADDY, in his capacity as a member of the civil service board of the city of Jacksonville Florida, J. C. DEKLE, in his capacity as a member of the civil service board of the city of Jacksonville, Florida, WILLIAM HALLOWES, in his capacity as a member of the civil service board of the city of Jacksonville Florida and others
:
SERVICE
Pitts v. Grantham et al
as 1:2013cv02383
Plaintiff:
Olando C. Pitts
Defendant:
Cindy Grantham, Terry Belvin and Juli Coffey
Pitts v. Grantham et al
as 3:2013cv00121
Plaintiff:
Olando C. Pitts
Defendant:
Cindy Grantham, Terry Belvin and Juli Coffey
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2012cv23333
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
MYERS v. STATE OF FLORIDA et al.
as 5:2012cv00259
Plaintiff:
ERIC SCOTT MYERS
Defendant:
STATE OF FLORIDA, COUNTY OF HOLMES, CITY OF BONIFAY and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Selleck v. City of Boynton Beach et al
as 9:2012cv80569
Plaintiff:
Floyd Selleck
Defendant:
City of Boynton Beach and David Coffey
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
