Cases 1 - 10 of 13
Mario Moya v. Officer Sterling Jackson, et al
as 23-13446
Plaintiff / Appellant:
MARIO MOYA
Defendant / Appellee:
STERLING JACKSON and CITY OF CHAMBLEE, GEORGIA
Travis Moya v. City of Alpharetta, et al
as 23-13275
Plaintiff / Appellant:
TRAVIS MOYA
Defendant / Appellee:
CITY OF ALPHARETTA, CHIEF OF POLICE, ALPHARETTA, R. A. SPLAWN, Alpharetta Police Lieutenant and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 23-13157
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant / Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Moya v. City of Alpharetta et al
as 1:2022cv02942
Plaintiff:
Travis Moya
Defendant:
City of Alpharetta, John Robison, R. A. Splawn and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2022cv22343
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Enlow et al v. Spears et al
as 6:2022cv01319
Plaintiff:
Lisa Enlow and John Enlow
Defendant:
Jeffrey Spears, Palm Bay Police Department, City of Palm Bay and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
US Freedom Flyers et al v. Atlas Air, Inc. et al
as 1:2022cv21477
Plaintiff:
US Freedom Flyers, Lane Caviness, Patrick Akerlund and others
Defendant:
Atlas Air, Inc., Flight Services International, LLC, EncompassAir, LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Employment Discrimination
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 9:2021cv82553
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12182 Americans with Disabilities Act
Moya v. Jackson et al
as 1:2021cv03481
Plaintiff:
Mario Moya
Defendant:
Officer Sterling Jackson and City of Chamblee, Georgia
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 9:2020cv80719
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
