Cases 1 - 10 of 17
PEN AMERICAN CENTER INC et al v. ESCAMBIA COUNTY SCHOOL DISTRICT et al
as 3:2023cv10385
Plaintiff:
PEN AMERICAN CENTER INC, SARAH BRANNEN, LINDSAY DURTSCHI and others
Defendant:
ESCAMBIA COUNTY SCHOOL DISTRICT and ESCAMBIA COUNTY SCHOOL BOARD
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2023cv00195
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Employment Discrimination
Brannen et al v. City of Jesup, Georgia et al
as 2:2022cv00065
Plaintiff:
Rachel Brannen, Jason LaRoche, Matthew LaRoche and others
Defendant:
City of Jesup, Georgia, Mike Lane, Ray Boyles and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Civil Rights Violation
Brannen v. McGlamery et al
as 6:2020cv00122
Defendant:
Dustin Lanier and Kirk Mcglamery
Plaintiff:
Clinton Reagor Brannen
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Brannen v. Isom et al
as 1:2019cv02913
Plaintiff:
Sam Brannen
Defendant:
Georgia Department of Natural Resources, Chris Kernahan and Eric Isom
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Brannen v. DeKalb County, Georgia et al
as 1:2018cv05835
Plaintiff:
Sam Brannen
Defendant:
DeKalb County, Georgia, Patrice Perkins-Hooker, Officer R. Weber and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2018cv05890
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Brannen v. DeKalb County, Georgia et al
as 1:2018cv02535
Plaintiff:
Sam L. Brannen, Jr.
Defendant:
DeKalb County, Georgia , Overtis H. Brantley and James M. Ottley
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1443
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2017cv00380
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
K.A. et al v. HOBBY et al
as 1:2017cv00099
Plaintiff:
K.A. , T.S. , B.S. and others
Defendant:
JEFF HOBBY, JOHN BRANNEN, TYLER TURNER and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
