Cases 1 - 10 of 1,142
Resendiz v. Christian et al
as 1:2024cv02452
Plaintiff:
Diana Resendiz
Defendant:
Officer Demetrius Christian, Clayton County, Georgia and John Doe(s) 1-3
Alsobrook v. City of Marietta et al
as 1:2024cv02249
Plaintiff:
Brandon Alsobrook
Defendant:
City of Marietta, David Beam, Bill Bruton, Jr. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201 Declaratory Judgment
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv21927
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12182 Americans with Disabilities Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv21911
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12182 Americans with Disabilities Act
William Windsor v. Orinda Evans, et al
as 24-11670
Plaintiff:
WILLIAM M. WINDSOR
Defendant:
JUDGE ORINDA D. EVANS, JUDGE WILLIAM S. DUFFEY, JR., JUDGE JULIE E. CARNES and others
Not Yet Classified:
SERVICE
Erickson v. United States of America et al
as 8:2024cv01155
Plaintiff:
Boris Roger Erickson
Defendant:
United States of America, State of Florida, County of Pinellas and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Reed v. Waters et al
as 3:2024cv00463
Plaintiff:
Ronnie Edward Reed
Defendant:
Thomas Kevin Waters, Joel Belgard, Nicholas Hackley and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Civil Rights Violation
Thomas et al v. Hill et al
as 1:2024cv01993
Plaintiff:
Walter Thomas and Desmond Bailey
Defendant:
Victor Hill and Does 1-10
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Anesha Parker v. Roseberte Clervil, et al
as 24-11293
Plaintiff:
ANESHA PARKER
Defendant:
ROSEBERTE CLERVIL, UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE, UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE and others
Moliere Dimanche, Jr. v. Takela Jackson, et al
as 24-11267
Plaintiff:
MOLIERE DIMANCHE, JR.
Defendant:
TAKELA JACKSON, RABIH TABBARA, NICOLAS LUCIANO MONTES and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
