Cases 1 - 10 of 50
Gold Creek Foods, LLC et al v. City of Dawsonville, Georgia et al
as 2:2024cv00071
Plaintiff:
Gold Creek Foods, LLC and Gold Creek Processing, LLC
Counter Claimant:
City of Dawsonville, Georgia
Defendant:
John Walden, Caleb Phillips, William Illg and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv24794
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 6:2023cv00585
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 0:2022cv61964
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Notice of Removal
Wacko's Too, Inc. et al v. City of Jacksonville
as 3:2022cv00798
Plaintiff:
Wacko's Too, Inc., MHHS-Sinsations, LLC, PATMILT, INC. and others
Defendant:
City of Jacksonville
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Civil Rights Violation
Dalton v. Richmond County Sheriff's Office et al
as 1:2022cv00038
Plaintiff:
Bertina Renae Brunson Mealing Dalton and Bertina R. Dalton
Defendant:
Pen Fed, Truist, Richmond County Sheriff's Office and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2022cv20915
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12182 Americans with Disabilities Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2022cv00108
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-(Citizenship)
Farwell v. City of Jacksonville et al
as 3:2021cv00777
Plaintiff:
Jeffrey M. Farwell
Defendant:
City of Jacksonville, Bryan Mosier, Robert Brady and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 9:2021cv80580
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
