Civil Rights Cases filed in the Eleventh Circuit Courts
Liss v. Jacksonville Aviation Authority et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 3:2019cv00185
Defendant: City of Jacksonville, PHILIP SPIKES, DANIEL MCCRORY and others
Plaintiff: FULTON P. LISS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Henegar v. Georgia Correctional Health, LLC et al
as 4:2018cv00192
Defendant: Lieutenant Stroh, Augusta University, Sergeant Keith and others
Plaintiff: David Henegar
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Harpo v. City of Sandy Springs et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2013cv04118
Plaintiff: Wilhy Harpo
Defendant: City of Sandy Springs, Fulton County Commission, Fulton County Sheriff and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
ESTATE OF JACK P KING v. FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 4:2012cv00603
Plaintiff: ESTATE OF JACK P KING
Defendant: FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS and INDIVIDUAL FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS MEDICAL PROVIDERS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Gerald Lindley v. Alan Robertson, et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 12-15073
Plaintiff - Appellant: GERALD NEIL LINDLEY
Defendant - Appellee: ALAN ROBERTSON, Dr; in his individual capacity and/or in his official capacity as medical provider at the Birmingham City and as an individual practicing physician, FIRST LINE CARE PC, an Alabama professional corporation providing health care and medical care at the Birmingham City Jail, ALWAYS THERE IN-HOME CARE INC., an Alabama corporation providing nursing services at the Birmingham City Jail, f.k.a. Almost Family In-Home Care Inc. and others
ESTATE OF JACK P KING v. FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS
as 4:2012cv00364
Defendant: FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS and INDIVIDUAL FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS MEDICAL PROVIDERS
Plaintiff: ESTATE OF JACK KING
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?