Cases 1 - 10 of 13
Michael Brown v. Robert Hooks, et al
as 23-11896
Plaintiff / Appellant:
MICHAEL B. BROWN
Defendant / Appellee:
ROBERT HOOKS, KERTAVIOUS COPPINS, AARON GUILLAUME and others
BROWN v. HOOKS
as 4:2023cv00095
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL B BROWN and MASON B BROWN
Defendant:
ROBERT HOOKS, KERTAVIOUS COPPINS, AARON GUILLAUME and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Glass v. Brown
as 1:2023cv01845
Plaintiff:
Kardarius Kantrez Glass
Defendant:
Judge Michael L. Brown
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
BROWN v. COLUMBUS CONSOLIDATED GOVERNMENT et al
as 4:2022cv00189
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL B BROWN
Defendant:
COLUMBUS CONSOLIDATED GOVERNMENT, ROBERT HOOKS, AARON GUILLAUME and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
BROWN v. HOOKS, et al.
as 4:2022cv00158
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL B BROWN
Defendant:
Officer ROBERT HOOKS, Officer KERTAVIOUS COPPINS, Officer AARON GUILLAUME and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
BROWN et al v. COLUMBUS POLICE DEPARTMENT et al
as 4:2021cv00162
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL B BROWN and CLARA VIRGINIA BRITTON
Defendant:
COLUMBUS POLICE DEPARTMENT, Officer ROBERT HOOKS, Officer KERTAVIOUS COPPINS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Tucker v. Bailey et al
as 5:2021cv00158
Defendant:
Dana Remus, Tammy A Whitcomb, Rodney Edward Amick and others
Plaintiff:
Jason David Tucker
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Andre v. Avignon et al
as 6:2020cv01361
Defendant:
Michael E Brown, Stanley Avignon and Michael E. Brown
Plaintiff:
Chodry Andre
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Baylor v. Browne
as 6:2019cv01492
Plaintiff:
Christopher G. Baylor
Defendant:
Michael K. Browne
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 18-10725
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant - Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
