Cases 1 - 10 of 19
Clervrain et al v. Rushing et al
as 2:2022cv00044
Plaintiff:
Manetirony Clervrain and Medgine Sarah Jean
Defendant:
Karen E. Rushing, Todd Newton, Jeffrey R. Smith and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Clervrain v. Shafer et al
as 1:2022cv00001
Defendant:
Peter B. Rutledge, David Shafer, Yang Yuanqing and others
Plaintiff:
Manetirony Clervrain
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
KELLY et al v. CAPTIAL ASSOCIATION MANAGEMENT GROUP et al
as 4:2021cv00419
Plaintiff:
ADRIANNE KELLY, LAMONTEZ MOYE and BRAXTON BURTON
Defendant:
CAPTIAL ASSOCIATION MANAGEMENT GROUP and YESILTAS MEHMET
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
DAMARIO v. GIRAUD et al
as 3:2021cv00935
Plaintiff:
AMANDA MAMIE DAMARIO
Defendant:
JOSE A GIRAUD, MARK DARREN PHILIP ALDERMAN, JAMES MOYE and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 8:2021cv00422
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 0704
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 8:2021cv00421
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981
ZINK v. CITY OF MONTEZUMA GEORGIA et al
as 5:2020cv00489
Defendant:
CHIEF MATTHEW I MOYE, MAYOR LARRY SMITH and CITY OF MONTEZUMA GEORGIA
Plaintiff:
ONDREA ZINK
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 8:2019cv01269
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Aubrey et al v. D Magazine Parners, L.P. et al
as 0:2018cv61117
Plaintiff:
Steven Benton Aubrey and Brian E. Vodicka
Defendant:
D Magazine Parners, L.P., Magazine Limited Partners, L.P., Allison Media, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981
Heard et al v. Deal et al
as 2:2014cv00179
Plaintiff:
Robert Heard
Defendant:
Nathan Deal, Doug Collins, G.B.I. Director and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
