Cases 1 - 10 of 16
Rotella v. Bagley et al
as 2:2017cv00247
Plaintiff:
John Rotella
Defendant:
Jeffrey Bagley, Sandra A. Partridge, T. Bradford and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Stephens v. Liberty Mutual Insurance Company et al
as 1:2016cv01753
Plaintiff:
Kalyn Stephens
Defendant:
Liberty Mutual Insurance Company, State of Georgia, City of Tucker and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2015cv02938
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
BROWN v. LUTTI et al
as 1:2015cv00130
Plaintiff:
HAMILTON BROWN
Defendant:
ROBERT LUTTI, DEPARTMENT OF COURT RECORDS ALLEGEHNEY COUNTY, JEREMY KOBESKI and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Brown v. Lutti et al
as 4:2015cv00139
Plaintiff:
Hamilton Brown
Defendant:
Robert Lutti, Department of Court Records, Allegheny County, Jeremy Kobeski and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981
Robbins v. Universal Music Group et al
as 4:2013cv00114
Plaintiff:
Kelvin Robbins
Defendant:
Universal Music Group, Universal Republic Records, Universal Motown Records and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Smith v. DeKalb County et al
as 1:2013cv00979
Plaintiff:
Agustin Smith
Defendant:
DeKalb County , DeKalb County Recorders Court , Thomas Brown and others
Robbins v. Universal Music Group et al
as 4:2012cv00292
Plaintiff:
Kelvin J. Robbins
Defendant:
Universal Music Group, Universal Motown Records, Universal Motown and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights
Robbins v. Universal Motown et al
as 4:2012cv00208
Plaintiff:
Kelvin J. Robbins
Defendant:
Universal Motown and Universal Republic Records
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981
Robbins v. Usher et al
as 4:2011cv00193
Plaintiff:
Kelvin J. Robbins
Defendant:
Usher, Laface, Sony Music Entertainment and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
