Cases 1 - 10 of 78
Caplan v. MB AUTO SPECIALISTS, LLC et al
as 0:2024cv60800
Plaintiff:
Howard Michael Caplan
Defendant:
MB AUTO SPECIALISTS, LLC and FP HALLANDALE III, LLC
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12182 Americans with Disabilities Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 6:2023cv01123
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Employment Discrimination
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2023cv00368
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Parker v. Eye South Partners et al
as 9:2023cv80433
Plaintiff:
Kameca Parker
Defendant:
Eye South Partners and Retina Care Specialists
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 23-10678
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant / Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2022cv05090
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 Job Discrimination (Sex)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2022cv00756
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 623 Job Discrimination (Age)
Albury v. Walcker et al
as 3:2022cv01182
Plaintiff:
Arthalia Albury
Defendant:
Nathan Walcker and Cancer Specialist of North Florida
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights
ALBURY v. WALCKER et al
as 1:2022cv00277
Plaintiff:
ARTHALIA ALBURY
Defendant:
NATHAN WALCKER, CEO CANCER SPECIALIST OF NORTH FLORIDA and CANCER SPECIALIST OF NORTH FLORIDA
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights
Caplan v. P & M One Stop Auto Shop, Inc. et al
as 1:2022cv22733
Plaintiff:
Howard Michael Caplan
Defendant:
P & M ONE STOP AUTO SHOP, INC. a Florida Profit Corporation doing business as AVENTURA AUTO SPECIALIST, ABBY NOAH INVESTMENT LLC and Abby Noah Investment, LLC.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12182 Americans with Disabilities Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
