Cases 1 - 10 of 11
Davenport v. City of Sarasota et al
as 8:2024cv01094
Plaintiff:
Ronald E. Davenport
Defendant:
City of Sarasota, Michael Dreznin, Aaron Stoll and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv03946
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 Job Discrimination (Sex)
Naster v. Quintal et al
as 6:2021cv00742
Defendant:
Virgil Quintal, Andrew Salazar and Brian Stoll
Plaintiff:
Blaine Alan Naster
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2020cv01091
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Williams et al v. City of Cartersville et al
as 4:2019cv00045
Plaintiff:
Daidron Williams, Eutychus Wilson, Aaron Conelly and others
Defendant:
Cullen LaFrance, Joshua Coker, Mark Mayton and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Negron Figueroa v. Mary Stoll
as 17-11636
Plaintiff - Appellant:
NEGRON EDUARDO FIGUEROA
Defendant - Appellee:
MARY STOLL
Figueroa v. Stoll
as 1:2017cv20338
Plaintiff:
Negron Eduardo Figueroa
Defendant:
Mary Stoll
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Gray v. Ivey et al
as 6:2017cv00118
Plaintiff:
Jeffery Marcus Gray
Defendant:
Wayne Ivey and Brian Stoll
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Harold Smith, et al v. Alan Confreda, et al
as 16-14957
Plaintiff - Appellant-Cross Appellee:
HAROLD SMITH, LAURA SMITH and SHANIKQUA SMITH
Defendant - Appellee:
ALAN J. CONFREDA, Individually, SHERIFF OF BREVARD COUNTY, FLORIDA and BRIAN STOLL, individually
Defendant - Appellee-Cross Appellant:
BRIAN GUILFORD, individually
Stoll v. Oceanside Palms Condominium Association, Inc.
as 6:2015cv00309
Plaintiff:
Timothy Stoll
Defendant:
Oceanside Palms Condominium Association, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 3601
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
