Cases 1 - 10 of 12
CHAPMAN v. T-MOBILE et al
as 4:2022cv00113
Defendant:
TRUIST BANK, T-MOBILE, T-MOBILE FINANCIAL LLC and others
Plaintiff:
CHRISTOPHER S RATIO LAFLARE CHAPMAN
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 22-11037
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant / Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 8:2020mc00093
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 0:2019cv62377
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12182
Smith v. BB&T Bank et al
as 3:2019cv00647
Defendant:
West Chevrolet Aaron, BB&T Bank, L.A. Story and others
Plaintiff:
James D. Smith
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
MALONE VS HOUSTON COUNTY SHERIFF'S DEPARTMENT, et al
as 5:2017cv00178
Plaintiff:
BOBBY MALONE
Defendant:
HOUSTON COUNTY SHERIFF'S DEPARTMENT , CULLEN TALTON , CITY OF WARNER ROBINS POLICE DEPARTMENT and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Bodmann et al v. JP Morgan Chase Bank, National Association et al
as 8:2014cv01884
Plaintiff:
James Bodmann and Lucille Bodmann
Defendant:
JP Morgan Chase Bank, National Association, M & T Bank Corporation and Bayview Loan Servicing LLC
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2014cv00102
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981
Silber v. Jackson Crisis Hospital et al
as 1:2010cv23040
Plaintiff:
Lee Silber
Defendant:
Jackson Crisis Hospital, Westchester General Hospital., Walgreen's and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1343
Silber (RESTRICTED FILER)v. Jackson Crisis Hospital et al
as 1:2010cv22834
Plaintiff:
Lee Silber
Defendant:
Jackson Crisis Hospital, Westchester General Hospital., Walgreens and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1343 Violation of Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
