Cases 1 - 10 of 15
GUTHRIE v. MCCALLUM et al
as 1:2024cv00069
Plaintiff:
MICHELLE GUTHRIE
Defendant:
BOBBY MCCALLUM, GERARD WILLIAMS and SAM QUINCEY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Ninth Amendment Party Association et al v. Rambosk et al
as 2:2023cv00830
Plaintiff:
Ninth Amendment Party Association and Milton Gerard Esquibel
Defendant:
Kevin Rambosk, Clovis Watson, Jr., Scotty Rhoden and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
GUTHRIE v. MCCALLUM et al
as 1:2023cv00238
Plaintiff:
Michelle Guthrie
Defendant:
Sheriff Bobby McCallum, Deputy Chase Gregory, Deputy Kevin Kinik and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
DUKES v. MCCALLUM et al
as 1:2023cv00045
Plaintiff:
Terry Dukes, Sr. and TERRY DUKES, SR
Defendant:
Sheriff Robert McCallum, Jr., Chase Gregory, Tucker Gaffey and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 23-10345
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant / Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2022cv00082
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2003 Job Discrimination
Amaro et al v. Carter et al
as 2:2022cv00023
Plaintiff:
Patsy Ann Amaro, Jake Calvin Conley, Samantha F. Jacobs and others
Defendant:
John Carter, Sergeant Tyra Little, Corporal James Stevens and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Sydney Fraiser v. Bobby McCallum, et al
as 16-17099
Plaintiff - Appellant:
SYDNEY CARL FRAISER
Defendant - Appellee:
BOBBY MCCALLUM, DENNIS STROW, R. W. PROCTOR and others
:
SERVICE
Sydney Frasier v. Bobby McCallum, et al
as 16-11919
Plaintiff - Appellant:
SYDNEY CARL FRASIER
Defendant - Appellee:
BOBBY MCCALLUM, SCOTT TUMMOND, ROGER BELL and others
FRASIER v. MCCALLUM, ET AL
as 1:2014cv00009
Plaintiff:
SYDNEY CARL FRASIER
Defendant:
BOBBY MCCALLUM, SCOTT TUMMOND, ROB BOWERS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
