Cases 91 - 100 of 300
NUNEZ v. LEAVINS et al
as 4:2021cv00101
Defendant:
MAXIE, JOHN DOE #20, BISHOP and others
Plaintiff:
JONATHAN NUNOZ and JONATHAN NUNEZ
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
AUGUSTINE v. INCH et al
as 4:2021cv00123
Defendant:
MARK INCH, DAVIS, BAINE and others
Plaintiff:
JULIO AUGUSTINE
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Pierre-Gilles v. Akima Global Services, LLC
as 1:2021cv20716
Defendant:
Akima Global Services, LLC, Michael W. Meade, Larry Niedziakeck and others
Plaintiff:
Herby Yves Pierre-Giles and Herby Yves Pierre-Gilles
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Ettienne Modeste v. Hillsborough County Sheriff Dpt. et al
as 1:2021cv21017
Plaintiff:
Dexter Ettienne Modeste, Jr.
Defendant:
Falkenburg County Jail, Hillsborough County Sheriff Dpt., John Doe 3 and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Diarra v. Cobb County Detention Facility et al
as 1:2021cv00479
Defendant:
Sheriff, Cobb County Detention Facility, Officer Floyd, Jeffrey and others
Plaintiff:
Moussa Diarra
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Davis v. Doe 1 et al
as 2:2021cv14021
Plaintiff:
De Javar C. Davis
Defendant:
John Doe 2, John Doe 1 and John Doe 3
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Chambers v. Pounds et al
as 1:2021cv00112
Defendant:
John Doe #1, Sgt. Miranda, John Doe #2 and others
Plaintiff:
Roy Chambers, Jr.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
JOHNSON v. DOE 1 et al
as 4:2020cv00579
Defendant:
JANE DOE, JOHN DOE 3, JOHN DOE 2 and others
Plaintiff:
SCOTT ALLAN JOHNSON
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
SEATS v. MAJORS et al
as 3:2020cv00127
Defendant:
OFFICER BRANDON TEMPLES, OFFICER JOHN DOE 2, OFFICER NATHAN MAJORS and others
Plaintiff:
MOSES SOLOMON ISAIAH SEATS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Davis-Bey v. Pooler et al
as 1:2020cv24967
Defendant:
John Doe #5, John Doe #4, Judge Teresa Pooler and others
Plaintiff:
Ronald E. Davis-Bey
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
