Cases 91 - 100 of 157,316
Cano v. Warden, FCC Coleman - Low
as 5:2024cv00257
Petitioner:
Francisco Magallon Cano
Respondent:
Warden, FCC Coleman - Low
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Walker v. Warden, FCC Coleman
as 5:2024cv00258
Petitioner:
Andrew Walker
Respondent:
Warden, FCC Coleman - Low
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Luzier v. Wheeler et al
as 6:2024cv00916
Plaintiff:
Joseph J. Luzier, III
Defendant:
Cleveland Wheeler, FNU Lane, Ryan Hines and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Wood
as 8:2024cv01194
Plaintiff:
Charity Noelle Wood
Defendant:
Jonathan Robert Hawkin, The State of Florida, Paul Showalter and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Perry v. Steibeck et al
as 2:2024cv00401
Plaintiff:
Kendrick Perry
Defendant:
Margaret O. Steibeck, Thomas W. Guthne and Lee County Sheriff's Office
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Tuten v. Warden et al
as 3:2024cv00495
Plaintiff:
Terry Burdette Tuten
Defendant:
Warden, Salyard, Medical Staff and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Williams-Clark v. McClelland et al
as 2:2024cv00109
Plaintiff:
Adam Y. Williams-Clark
Defendant:
Chief Judge Troy Russell McClelland and City of Cumming, Georgia
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Brinson v. Warden, FCI Jesup
as 2:2024cv00068
Petitioner:
Raheem T. Brinson
Respondent:
Warden, FCI Jesup
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Davis v. West et al
as 6:2024cv00024
Plaintiff:
Louis Davis
Defendant:
Warden Mr. West and Brinden Murry
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Jackson v. Ward et al
as 3:2024cv00033
Plaintiff:
William R. Jackson
Defendant:
Timothy C. Ward, Kim Patton-Johnson and Stephanie Damiels
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
