Cases 121 - 130 of 39,723
JACKSON v. SAMPSON et al
as 5:2024cv00100
Plaintiff:
TREVELIS DIVINCI JACKSON
Defendant:
WARDEN SAMPSON, WARDEN GRACE, CERT OFFICER LOCKHART and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Latimore v. McFarlane
as 1:2024cv02159
Petitioner:
Roy Latimore
Respondent:
Andrew McFarlane
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv02174
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 pr Complaint for mandamus relief (prisoner)
Benham v. Allen et al
as 2:2024cv00067
Plaintiff:
David-Charles Benham
Defendant:
Greg Allen, Judge McClellan, Forsyth Co. Sheriff Freeman and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
WATSON v. BUTTS COUNTY SUPERIOR COURT et al
as 5:2024cv00109
Petitioner:
JORDAN WATSON and JORDAN A WATSON
Respondent:
BUTTS COUNTY SUPERIOR COURT, THOMAS H WILSON, MICHAEL PARISH and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Woods v. Wiza
as 1:2024cv02180
Petitioner:
Fabian Woods, Jr.
Respondent:
Sgt. Scott Wiza
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
McKenna v. Conway
as 1:2024cv02161
Plaintiff:
Kevin H. McKenna
Defendant:
Matthew R. Conway
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Sifuentes v. Unknown
as 4:2024cv00130
Plaintiff:
Gerardo Roel Sifuentes
Defendant:
Unknown
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Larry v. Mims
as 4:2024cv00066
Petitioner:
Julius James Larry, IV
Respondent:
Charles M Mims
Not Yet Classified:
Attorney General State of Georgia (Notice Only)
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Myers v. Adams
as 6:2024cv00012
Plaintiff:
Daniel Alonzo Myers
Defendant:
Warden Robert Adams
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
