Cases 11 - 20 of 189
Tabitha McKenzie v. Casey Barren, et al
as 24-10852
Plaintiff:
TABITHA MCKENZIE
Defendant:
CASEY T. BARREN, ERIC LOVE, GOVERNOR OF FLORIDA and others
MCKISSIC v. ZIEGLER et al
as 4:2024cv00026
Plaintiff:
CARLTON STEVE MCKISSIC
Defendant:
Corporal SHERRY ZIEGLER, VALERIE HOLDER, R T BOREN and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Scott v. Frizzell et al
as 5:2023cv00679
Plaintiff:
Fabian Scott
Defendant:
Amy Frizzell and Virginia Mesa, M.D.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal- Civil Rights Act
Levi v. Miami Federal Correction Institution
as 1:2023cv23932
Plaintiff:
Amnon Ami Levi
Defendant:
Miami Federal Correction Institution
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Fendley v. King et al
as 5:2023cv00085
Plaintiff:
Gary J. Fendley
Defendant:
Amy King, Jane Doe, Officer Bahaman and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
TERRELL v. SEALS et al
as 5:2023cv00315
Plaintiff:
MARCUS ANTHONY TERRELL
Defendant:
WARDEN SEALS, PAUL, LUCAS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Levi v. FCI-Miami-Warden
as 1:2023cv23070
Plaintiff:
Amnon Ami Levi
Defendant:
FCI-Miami-Warden
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
MCKENZIE v. LOVE et al
as 4:2023cv00198
Plaintiff:
TABITHA MEGAN MCKENZIE and CASEY TIDWELL BARREN
Defendant:
ERIC LOVE, RON DESANTIS, NEAL DUNN and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
HARRIS v. FORRESTER-TROUPE et al
as 3:2023cv10297
Plaintiff:
LUIS MUNUZURI HARRIS
Defendant:
KENA FORRESTER-TROUPE, LUIS LOPEZ-RIVERA, KRISTAL AKE and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Wood v. Boncher
as 0:2023cv60755
Plaintiff:
Dale Scott Wood
Defendant:
Amy Boncher
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
