Cases 11 - 20 of 54
Mitchell v. Spradlin
as 3:2020cv00078
Plaintiff:
Kerry Scott Mitchell
Defendant:
Shain Spradlin, Andy Richie, Unknown a.c.e. Unit Officers and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Brown v. Richmond County's Major of Charles B. Webster Detention Center
as 1:2019cv00116
Defendant:
Richmond County's Major of Charles B. Webster Detention Center, Mayor Hardey, Andy Scott and others
Plaintiff:
Jerry L. Brown, Sr.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Sampson v. Gray et al
as 4:2019cv00090
Plaintiff:
Michael Sampson
Defendant:
FNU Gray, FNU Hurb, Andi Hurb and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
BELLAS v. MURRAY COUNTY SHERIFFS DEPARTMENT et al
as 4:2018cv00095
Plaintiff:
ANTHONY LYNN BELLAS
Defendant:
MURRAY COUNTY SHERIFFS DEPARTMENT, ANDY DILLS, BOATWRIGHT and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
BELLAS v. MURRAY COUNTY SHERIFFS DEPARTMENT et al
as 1:2018cv00022
Plaintiff:
ANTHONY LYNN BELLAS
Defendant:
MURRAY COUNTY SHERIFFS DEPARTMENT, ANDY DILLS, BOATWRIGHT and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
SNEED v. BRYSON et al
as 5:2018cv00002
Plaintiff:
JAMES ANDY SNEED
Defendant:
HOMER BRYSON, EDWARD PHILBIN and SCOTT WILKES
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
NOWELL v. ALABAMA, STATE OF et al
as 4:2017cv00238
Plaintiff:
ANDY NOWELL
Defendant:
ALABAMA, STATE OF, COLUMBUS GEORGIA, JEREMY ARMSTRONG and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
NOWELL v. ALABAMA, STATE OF
as 4:2017cv00237
Petitioner:
ANDY NOWELL
Respondent:
ALABAMA, STATE OF
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
NOWELL v. MUSCOGEE COUNTY GEORGIA et al
as 4:2017cv00230
Petitioner:
ANDY NOWELL
Respondent:
MUSCOGEE COUNTY GEORGIA, COLUMBUS GEORGIA and ALABAMA, STATE OF
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Eady v. Dodge County Court et al
as 3:2017cv00057
Plaintiff:
Andy Eady
Defendant:
Dodge County Court, Tammatha Wiggins, District Attorney and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
