Cases 11 - 20 of 77,722
Funk v. Secretary, Department of Corrections (Hillsborough)
as 8:2024cv01518
Petitioner:
Jason Matthew Funk
Respondent:
Secretary, Department of Corrections
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Conaway v. Vanelswyk
as 8:2024cv01522
Plaintiff:
Jermaine R. Conaway
Defendant:
Brice Vanelswyk
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Pete v. Sarasota County Jail
as 8:2024cv01517
Plaintiff:
Raynard Pete
Defendant:
Sarasota County Jail
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hicks v. Hernando County Detention Center et al
as 8:2024cv01520
Plaintiff:
Victor Wade Hicks
Defendant:
Hernando County Detention Center and Hernando County Courthouse
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
SOLOMON v. BRAHAM et al
as 5:2024cv00126
Plaintiff:
RICHARD CARNELL SOLOMON
Defendant:
BRAHAM and J FLOYD
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
IRVIN v. FEDERAL BUREAU OF PRISONS
as 5:2024cv00129
Petitioner:
PHILLIS IRVIN
Respondent:
FEDERAL BUREAU OF PRISONS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Morais v. Secretary, Department of Corrections (Duval)
as 3:2024cv00642
Petitioner:
Barrington Elliot Morais
Respondent:
Secretary, Department of Corrections
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
LYNN v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
as 4:2024cv00253
Petitioner:
JOHN BUFORD LYNN
Defendant:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
MAKENDY v. SUMMERS et al
as 4:2024cv00252
Plaintiff:
ALFRED MAKENDY
Defendant:
W SUMMERS, MAJOR CHILDS, T MCCROWSKY and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
HYDE v. FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF CORPORATIONS et al
as 3:2024cv00293
Plaintiff:
TRISTAN MICHAEL HYDE
Defendant:
FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF CORPORATIONS and ANGELA LILES
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
