Cases 11 - 20 of 21
Stern v. Adams et al
as 5:2010cv00241
Plaintiff:
Leonardo Bernard Stern
Defendant:
Alan Adams, Medical College of Georgia Healthcare and Medical College of Georgia
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Jones v. Taylor et al
as 5:2009cv00391
Plaintiff:
David Jones, Jr
Defendant:
James Taylor, Ayman Ali, Steven Roberts and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Baldwin v. Perron et al
as 5:2009cv00372
Plaintiff:
Melvin Baldwin
Defendant:
Dr Perron, James E Donald, Dr Benjamin and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights (Employment Discrimination)
Arnold v. Adams et al
as 5:2009cv00322
Plaintiff:
Rashad Arnold
Defendant:
Alan Adams, David Larry Fraizier, Fred Head and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Adkison v. Owens et al
as 5:2009cv00263
Plaintiff:
Robert Adkison, Jr
Defendant:
Brian Owens, Alan Adams, Dr. Goel and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Clayton v. Georgia Department of Corrections et al
as 3:2009cv00042
Plaintiff:
Luther James Clayton
Defendant:
Georgia Department of Corrections, Anthony Washington, Jackie Morgan and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Cobb v. Kilgore et al
as 5:2009cv00207
Plaintiff:
Kerry Reginald Cobb
Defendant:
Connie Kilgore, S Crowe, G Yancey and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Clarke v. Adams
as 1:2009cv01406
Plaintiff:
Jerome Clarke
Defendant:
Alan Adams
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hawkins v. Adams et al
as 5:2009cv00173
Plaintiff:
Charles Hawkins
Defendant:
Alan Adams, Caleb Ajibade and Stanley Bishop
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Fedd v. Owens et al
as 1:2009cv00052
Plaintiff:
Frank Solomon Fedd, Sr.
Defendant:
Brian Owens, Thomas Ammons, Terry Duffey and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
