Prisoner Petitions Cases filed in Georgia
Cases 11 - 20 of 31
MCKISSICK v. DEAL et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 5:2015cv00407
Plaintiff: RODERICK MCKISSICK
Defendant: NATHAN DEAL, BRIAN OWENS, HOMER BRYSON and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Barfield v. USA
as 5:2015cv00242
Respondent: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Petitioner: CHARLIE LEE BARFIELD
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
HEARD v. EDENFIELD et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 7:2014cv00026
Plaintiff: ROBERT HEARD
Defendant: BERRY AVANT EDENFIELD, W LEON BARFIELD, G R SMITH and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
HEARD v. OWENS et al
as 7:2014cv00021
Plaintiff: ROBERT HEARD
Defendant: BRIAN OWENS, AVANT EDENFIELD, W LEON BARFIELD and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
BARFIELD v. GORE et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 5:2014cv00004
Plaintiff: DANIEL BARFIELD
Defendant: MARY GORE and BUTTS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Heard v. O'Kelly et al
as 1:2013cv02507
Plaintiff: Robert Heard
Defendant: William O'Kelly, E. Clayton Scofield, Sam Olens and others
Miller v. Georgia Department of Corrections (A.S.M.P.) et al
as 1:2013cv00109
Plaintiff: Tracy Anthony Miller
Defendant: Georgia Department of Corrections (A.S.M.P.), Dennis Brown, James and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Heard v. O'Kelly et al
as 1:2013cv02105
Plaintiff: Robert Heard
Defendant: William C. O'Kelly, C. Ashley Royal, E. Clayton Scofield and others
Mitchell v. Wilson et al
as 4:2013cv00010
Plaintiff: Eddie Shane Mitchell
Defendant: Steve Wilson, f/n/u Steel, f/n/u Roberts and others
Henderson v. Graham, et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 3:2012cv00085
Plaintiff: Keith Henderson
Defendant: James E. Graham, Lisa Godbey Wood, W. Leon Barfield and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?